From PyFlink to Fluvio: Why We Migrated Our CEF Log Pipeline

25 October 2025

When dealing with high-velocity event streams like CEF (Common Event Format) logs, scalability and real-time precision matter just as much as simplicity. After months of experimentation and optimization with Apache Flink, our team made a bold yet rewarding decision — migrating our entire CEF log parsing pipeline to Fluvio, a Rust-based streaming platform designed for the modern Kubernetes era.

PyFlink extends Apache Flink's capabilities to Python developers by wrapping Java APIs through a bridge between Python and the JVM. While that's impressive in design, we found a few challenges hard to ignore:

Serialization Overhead: Every Python-Java data exchange requires serialization/deserialization, which introduces noticeable latency and CPU costs, especially when processing high-frequency logs.

Heavy Infrastructure: Even a small PyFlink job required running JobManagers and TaskManagers with significant JVM memory footprints, making it difficult to scale efficiently in Kubernetes clusters.

Deployment Friction: Packaging PyFlink jobs as container images meant juggling Python dependencies, JDK requirements, and the Flink operator's resource definition for Kubernetes. Local testing mirrored none of that complexity.

Limited Python Flexibility: Since PyFlink executes through the JVM, we couldn't fully leverage Python's ecosystem without hitting bridge-related constraints or debugging issues that required Java insight.

In short, PyFlink is powerful, but it's also Java-heavy, resource-intensive, and slow to iterate for modern container-native environments.

Moving to Fluvio reshaped our entire approach to real-time log transformation. Here's how.

1. SmartModules: Inline CEF Transformation

Instead of maintaining Python UDFs that get serialized into JVM code, we now use Rust-based SmartModules compiled to WebAssembly. These transformations run inline on the stream, reducing latency and removing the need for a separate ETL layer or job orchestration.

2. Lightweight Architecture

Fluvio's Rust core and async runtime deliver performance with almost no operational cost. Tests showed:

  • Up to 5× faster throughput
  • 10–50× less memory usage compared to PyFlink-based jobs
  • A single Fluvio streaming unit (SPU) idled at ~50 MB RAM, versus PyFlink's multi-GB footprint in Kubernetes.

3. Kubernetes-Native by Design

Fluvio integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes as a first-class citizen. There are no external job managers, no coordination via Zookeeper, and no JVM tuning required. The entire cluster can scale via simple YAML definitions — a huge leap over PyFlink's multi-step operator-based pipeline setup.

4. Single Binary Deployment

Where PyFlink required a Python image stacked over a JDK base — often exceeding several hundred MB, Fluvio delivers a 50 MB single binary deployable anywhere. This drastically simplified our CI/CD and improved cold-start times for new workloads.

5. Developer Velocity

Perhaps the most underrated improvement: productivity. With Fluvio, we can:

  • Spin up local clusters identical to production
  • Test SmartModules in isolation
  • Debug transformations in pure Rust or WASM

That's night and day compared to PyFlink's complex container orchestration for even minor code changes.

The Result

Transitioning from PyFlink to Fluvio delivered:

  • Reduced infrastructure overhead (no JVM or external dependencies)
  • Real-time inline log transformation via SmartModules
  • Lightning-fast deployment across dev, test, and production
  • Better developer experience through native tooling and uniform workflow

Final Thoughts

Our PyFlink setup taught us valuable lessons in stream processing at scale but it also exposed the practical challenges of running JVM-dependent systems in a Kubernetes world. Fluvio, with its Rust foundation and WASM execution model, provides the best of both performance and simplicity.

For real-time pipelines like CEF log parsing, where compact transformations and low latency are paramount, Fluvio isn't just faster than PyFlink, it's architecturally cleaner, operationally leaner, and developer-approved.